A milestone has been reached: the CO₂ footprint is complete. It provides a clear picture of the current emissions status and shows how emissions are distributed across different sources. This creates an important foundation.
But what comes next?
The real value of a CO₂ footprint does not lie in transparency alone, but in the decisions and actions that follow from it. The key is to use the available data to set clear priorities and define a realistic path forward.
This article explains how companies can do exactly that.
Once the footprint has been completed, the challenge shifts. Instead of collecting data, the focus moves to interpreting the results and turning them into a sound basis for decision-making. Which questions matter most depends on each company’s individual starting point.
For example:
Step 1: Putting the results into context: What really matters for our company?
A CO₂ footprint provides numerous starting points for further actions and decisions. However, not every option is equally relevant to your individual climate strategy. A first step is therefore to place the results in the context of the company.
At this stage, the question “Where do our emissions arise?” evolves into: “Which of these emissions are particularly relevant for the decarbonisation of our company?” This assessment creates the basis for allocating resources in a targeted way, focusing on areas where both the need for action and the potential impact are greatest.
Step 2: Defining climate targets: Where do we want to go?
Once the main emission drivers and key areas for action are known, companies should ask: How much do we want to reduce our emissions, and over what period of time? The aim is to define climate targets that fit the company’s starting point, strategic objectives and expected future development.
The following questions can help:
Reduction scenarios can help make different development pathways visible. They show how emissions could evolve under different assumptions and what gap remains between measures that are already planned and the desired target. Step 2 turns a general intention to reduce emissions into a concrete target framework. It also shows which measures could generally be considered in order to achieve the company’s climate targets.
Step 3: Prioritising measures: What should we do first?
At this stage, companies often end up with a long list of potential measures: renewable energy, improved building efficiency, electrification of the vehicle fleet, changes in procurement, collaboration with suppliers, or adjustments to products and processes. Few companies have the resources to implement all measures at the same time. The next step is therefore to prioritise them.
Looking solely at the theoretical CO₂ reduction potential is not enough. Investment requirements, available budgets, economic viability, feasibility, time horizons and dependencies can all be relevant to the decision.
An example:
The largest source of emissions does not automatically have to be the first area of action
Suppose a company’s CO₂ footprint shows that around 70 percent of its emissions arise in Scope 3, particularly from purchased materials. This clearly identifies a major area for action. However, it does not automatically mean that the most effective measures can be implemented there in the short term.
There may be long-term supplier contracts in place. Alternative materials may not yet be available in sufficient quantities or may first need to undergo technical testing.
At the same time, the footprint may show a smaller share of emissions from the company’s own heating system. If the system is due to be replaced anyway, a lower-emission solution may be implemented in the short term and combined with an investment that was already planned.
In this case, the footprint shows where the largest emissions occur. Prioritisation determines where and when action should be taken.
For purchased materials, for example, a longer-term transformation pathway involving suppliers may be required. By contrast, the heating system may offer a concrete decision window that can already be used today.
Step 4: Managing implementation: Establishing responsibilities and governance
A climate strategy does not end with an action plan. To turn planned measures into actual change, companies need to define who is responsible for implementation, how progress is measured, and when decisions should be reviewed or adjusted.
This can include:
A CO₂ footprint answers one central question: Where are we today?
For the future development of a company, however, additional questions are crucial: Where do we want to go? Where is the greatest need for action? Which measures make sense? Which investments are required? And how do we manage implementation?
This is precisely where the difference lies between pure transparency and the strategic use of emissions data.
The bottleneck therefore often does not lie in data collection alone. The key is the ability to translate existing data into priorities, targets and concrete business decisions.
Ultimately, the value of a CO₂ footprint does not come from knowing the emissions alone. It comes from the decisions and actions that follow.