Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "Klimaschutzbeiträge glaubwürdig und EmpCo-konform kommunizieren"
#Knowledge
Climate strategy & accounting

CO₂ footprint completed: How companies can derive targets and actions

Info about the article

Author
Julia Jahn, Gianluca Vassallo
Article from
06.10.2026
Updated on
06.10.2026
Approximate reading time
minutes
Share article

A milestone has been reached: the CO₂ footprint is complete. It provides a clear picture of the current emissions status and shows how emissions are distributed across different sources. This creates an important foundation.

But what comes next?

The real value of a CO₂ footprint does not lie in transparency alone, but in the decisions and actions that follow from it. The key is to use the available data to set clear priorities and define a realistic path forward.

This article explains how companies can do exactly that.

The next questions after completing a CO₂ footprint

Once the footprint has been completed, the challenge shifts. Instead of collecting data, the focus moves to interpreting the results and turning them into a sound basis for decision-making. Which questions matter most depends on each company’s individual starting point.

For example:

  • “We know our largest sources of emissions. But where should we start?”
  • “We want to define climate targets, but we are unsure how ambitious they should be.”
  • “We want to understand which emissions we can influence directly and where we depend on suppliers or other partners.”
  • “We have already identified potential measures, but now we need a concrete implementation plan.”
  • “We need to establish responsibilities, governance and reporting within the company.”
  • “We want to understand which investments actually make a meaningful contribution to decarbonisation.”

From footprint to implementation: the next steps

Step 1: Putting the results into context: What really matters for our company?
A CO₂ footprint provides numerous starting points for further actions and decisions. However, not every option is equally relevant to your individual climate strategy. A first step is therefore to place the results in the context of the company.

  • Where are our main emission drivers?
  • Which of them can we influence directly?
  • Where do we depend on suppliers, customers or technological developments?
  • Which areas are particularly relevant for future investments?
  • And what role do factors such as customer requirements, regulatory developments, energy and CO₂ costs, or climate-related risks play

At this stage, the question “Where do our emissions arise?” evolves into: “Which of these emissions are particularly relevant for the decarbonisation of our company?” This assessment creates the basis for allocating resources in a targeted way, focusing on areas where both the need for action and the potential impact are greatest.

Step 2: Defining climate targets: Where do we want to go?
Once the main emission drivers and key areas for action are known, companies should ask: How much do we want to reduce our emissions, and over what period of time? The aim is to define climate targets that fit the company’s starting point, strategic objectives and expected future development.

The following questions can help:

  • What reductions can already be achieved through planned measures?
  • What additional changes would be necessary to go further?
  • Which investments, technological developments or changes in the supply chain are required to achieve these targets?
  • Over what timeframe can these steps realistically be implemented?
  • Which external requirements or expectations should be taken into account when defining the targets?

Reduction scenarios can help make different development pathways visible. They show how emissions could evolve under different assumptions and what gap remains between measures that are already planned and the desired target. Step 2 turns a general intention to reduce emissions into a concrete target framework. It also shows which measures could generally be considered in order to achieve the company’s climate targets.

Step 3: Prioritising measures: What should we do first?
At this stage, companies often end up with a long list of potential measures: renewable energy, improved building efficiency, electrification of the vehicle fleet, changes in procurement, collaboration with suppliers, or adjustments to products and processes. Few companies have the resources to implement all measures at the same time. The next step is therefore to prioritise them.

Looking solely at the theoretical CO₂ reduction potential is not enough. Investment requirements, available budgets, economic viability, feasibility, time horizons and dependencies can all be relevant to the decision.

An example:
The largest source of emissions does not automatically have to be the first area of action

Suppose a company’s CO₂ footprint shows that around 70 percent of its emissions arise in Scope 3, particularly from purchased materials. This clearly identifies a major area for action. However, it does not automatically mean that the most effective measures can be implemented there in the short term.

There may be long-term supplier contracts in place. Alternative materials may not yet be available in sufficient quantities or may first need to undergo technical testing.

At the same time, the footprint may show a smaller share of emissions from the company’s own heating system. If the system is due to be replaced anyway, a lower-emission solution may be implemented in the short term and combined with an investment that was already planned.

In this case, the footprint shows where the largest emissions occur. Prioritisation determines where and when action should be taken.

For purchased materials, for example, a longer-term transformation pathway involving suppliers may be required. By contrast, the heating system may offer a concrete decision window that can already be used today.

Step 4: Managing implementation: Establishing responsibilities and governance
A climate strategy does not end with an action plan. To turn planned measures into actual change, companies need to define who is responsible for implementation, how progress is measured, and when decisions should be reviewed or adjusted.

This can include:

  • clear responsibilities for individual targets and measures,
  • suitable KPIs and regular monitoring,
  • defined processes for repeating the CO₂ footprint in subsequent years,
  • integration of relevant climate KPIs into existing management and reporting processes, and
  • regular review of measures, assumptions and target pathways.

To
summarize

A CO₂ footprint answers one central question: Where are we today?

For the future development of a company, however, additional questions are crucial: Where do we want to go? Where is the greatest need for action? Which measures make sense? Which investments are required? And how do we manage implementation?

This is precisely where the difference lies between pure transparency and the strategic use of emissions data.

The bottleneck therefore often does not lie in data collection alone. The key is the ability to translate existing data into priorities, targets and concrete business decisions.

Ultimately, the value of a CO₂ footprint does not come from knowing the emissions alone. It comes from the decisions and actions that follow.

Further contributions

Climate strategy & accounting
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "Dekarbonisierung wirtschaftlich bewerten: So entsteht ein belastbarer Business Case"
#Knowledge

Making Your Climate Strategy Visible: Creating Transparency and Building Trust

A well-founded climate strategy provides the foundation – but effective communication is what makes targets, measures and progress visible. How can companies engage employees, build trust with stakeholders and meet the requirements of the EmpCo Directive at the same time?
Read more
Climate strategy & accounting
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "Monetär oder aktivitätsbasiert? Warum die Methode über die Aussagekraft Ihrer CO₂-Bilanz entscheidet"
#Knowledge

Decarbonization: Building a Robust Business Case

Which decarbonization measures make economic sense and which should be prioritized? This article shows how companies can compare investments on a sound basis, factor in CO₂ costs and regulatory developments, and build a robust business case.
Read more
Climate strategy & accounting
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "Nicht jede co₂e-Frage braucht dieselbe Datentiefe"
#Knowledge

Monetary or activity-based carbon footprint?

Monetary data provides a quick entry point into carbon accounting. But for major emission sources, it quickly reaches its limits. Our article explains when activity data becomes essential – and why the calculation method determines what you can later derive from your carbon footprint.
Read more
Climate strategy & accounting
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "CO₂-Bilanz erstellt: So leiten Unternehmen Ziele und Maßnahmen ab"
#Knowledge

Not Every CO₂e Question Requires the Same Level of Data Detail

While estimates or average values are often sufficient for initial insights, more detailed data is needed for specific decisions and emission reduction measures. Our article uses typical questions to show which level of data detail makes sense in which situations – and where the additional effort required for data collection really pays off.
Read more
Communication & brand
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "EmpCo-Altbestände: Gibt es eine offizielle Abverkaufsfrist?"
#Knowledge

Communicating Climate Contributions Credibly and in Line with EmpCo

The EmpCo Directive significantly changes the requirements for climate-related claims. This article explains how climate contributions can be communicated transparently, the role of Contribution Claims, and what companies should consider to ensure credible climate communication going forward
Read more
Bild der Fokus Zukunft Direktorinnen Janina Lang und Lena Scharr.
#Interview

10 Years of “Fokus Zukunft”: 5 Questions for Janina Lang & Lena Scharr

To mark the 10th anniversary of Fokus Zukunft, our directors, Janina Lang and Lena Scharr, discuss how sustainability has evolved, the milestones that have shaped the company, and what will be important in the future.
Read more
Communication & brand
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "CCF softwaregestützt erstellen: Unsere Partnerschaft mit Carbon+Alt+Delete"
#Knowledge

EmpCo Old Stock: Is There an Official Sell-Through Period?

What happens from 27 September 2026 to goods, packaging and labels that have already been produced and contain sustainability claims? The CPC Common Understanding provides guidance on how authorities should deal with genuine transitional situations and which measures companies should consider now.
Read more
Innovation & transformation
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "CCF softwaregestützt erstellen: Unsere Partnerschaft mit Carbon+Alt+Delete"
#Knowledge

Digital Product Passport: Creating the Right Conditions for Implementation Now

The Digital Product Passport is becoming a concrete reality – and for companies, preparation starts long before the passport itself. What matters is whether product data, responsibilities and processes are already set up effectively. Find out what is becoming important now and how companies can get started.
Read more
Communication & brand
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "Muss der Nachhaltigkeitsbericht Green Claims/EmpCo konform sein?"
#Knowledge

What EmpCo and the Swiss Unfair Competition Act (UWG) Mean for Companies

Many companies are no longer directly subject to CSRD reporting requirements due to the Omnibus package. But does that really mean sustainability reporting is losing relevance? This article shows why voluntary reporting creates orientation right now — for customer requests, banks, tenders and better internal decision-making.
Read more