Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel zu ETS II
#Knowledge
Climate strategy & accounting

ETS II: postponement to 2028?

What this means for companies

Info about the article

Author
Danielle Feldstein
Article from
06.11.2025
Updated on
13.02.2026
Approximate reading time
minutes
Share article

Originally, the new Emissions Trading System II (ETS II) was supposed to start in 2027. Now a postponement to 2028 is on the cards. For many German companies that are already covered by the national emissions trading system (nEHS), this raises questions about competitive fairness and planning security.

In this article you will find all the important information about ETS II.

What is ETS II?

The new European emissions trading system ETS II extends CO₂ trading to buildings, transportation and small industrial facilities. The aim is to also include those sectors in the pricing of emissions that are not yet covered by EU emissions trading (ETS I). This is intended to further expand climate protection in Europe and regulate CO₂ emissions more comprehensively.

Reasons for the postponement of ETS II

In 18 hours of marathon negotiations on November 5, 2025, the EU member states reached a political agreement to postpone the start of ETS II until 2028.
This option was already included in the ETS II Directive: the European Commission may postpone the start if gas or crude oil prices remain above a defined threshold until mid-2026. What is therefore new is not the option itself, but the decision to actually make use of it.

Formal confirmation from the Commission is still pending. The postponement will only become legally binding once it officially implements the decision.

Political classification

The postponement of ETS II is linked to the ongoing negotiations on the European climate targets for 2040. The EU has agreed to set the target slightly lower than originally planned.

Germany, represented by Environment Minister Carsten Schneider, agreed to make the agreement possible. An important topic in the talks was how much of the planned emission reductions could be achieved by purchasing international climate certificates – i.e. through projects outside the EU. Germany wanted to set strict limits here: a maximum of three percentage points of the reduction should be achieved in this way.

Until it is finally clear when ETS II will start, Germany is planning a transitional solution: an auction-based CO₂ levy will continue to apply in 2026. This is intended to ensure that there is a price effect for emissions in the meantime.

Effects on companies

For many German companies that are already active in the national emissions trading system (nEHS), the postponement primarily brings uncertainty.

  • Distortion of competition: Companies in countries without comparable CO₂ pricing have cost advantages.
  • Planning uncertainty: The unclear situation makes investment decisions more difficult.
  • Lack of market signals: Without a reliable start date, incentives for decarbonization strategies remain weak.

Austria also operates a national emissions trading system. Other countries such as Ireland or Norway will probably not participate in the initial phase due to high national energy taxes or existing regulations.

What companies can do now

  1. Continue to plan strategically for ETS II: Companies that are already affected by the national emissions trading system (nEHS) can continue to use many processes and structures. Those who plan scenarios at an early stage avoid later adjustment costs and can prepare investments in a targeted manner. It is important to clearly define internal responsibilities and systematically expand reporting on energy consumption and emissions.
  2. Support industry initiatives: The details of ETS II have not yet been finalized. Associations and industry initiatives therefore play a key role in introducing practical solutions and pushing for fair competitive conditions.
  3. Take advantage of subsidy programs: Even if the introduction of ETS II is delayed, there are numerous subsidy opportunities for climate-friendly technologies and efficiency measures. Those who take advantage of these funds now can reduce emissions and cost risks before CO₂ prices rise further.

To summarize

Even if the start of ETS II is likely to be postponed, companies should not lose sight of the issue. The political decision does not change the fact that CO₂ emissions will be increasingly priced in the coming years – the only question is when and at what speed.

We would be happy to advise you on the subject of ETS II.

Contact us now

Further contributions

Climate strategy & accounting
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "Dekarbonisierung wirtschaftlich bewerten: So entsteht ein belastbarer Business Case"
#Knowledge

Making Your Climate Strategy Visible: Creating Transparency and Building Trust

A well-founded climate strategy provides the foundation – but effective communication is what makes targets, measures and progress visible. How can companies engage employees, build trust with stakeholders and meet the requirements of the EmpCo Directive at the same time?
Read more
Climate strategy & accounting
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "Monetär oder aktivitätsbasiert? Warum die Methode über die Aussagekraft Ihrer CO₂-Bilanz entscheidet"
#Knowledge

Decarbonization: Building a Robust Business Case

Which decarbonization measures make economic sense and which should be prioritized? This article shows how companies can compare investments on a sound basis, factor in CO₂ costs and regulatory developments, and build a robust business case.
Read more
Climate strategy & accounting
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "Nicht jede co₂e-Frage braucht dieselbe Datentiefe"
#Knowledge

Monetary or activity-based carbon footprint?

Monetary data provides a quick entry point into carbon accounting. But for major emission sources, it quickly reaches its limits. Our article explains when activity data becomes essential – and why the calculation method determines what you can later derive from your carbon footprint.
Read more
Climate strategy & accounting
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "CO₂-Bilanz erstellt: So leiten Unternehmen Ziele und Maßnahmen ab"
#Knowledge

Not Every CO₂e Question Requires the Same Level of Data Detail

While estimates or average values are often sufficient for initial insights, more detailed data is needed for specific decisions and emission reduction measures. Our article uses typical questions to show which level of data detail makes sense in which situations – and where the additional effort required for data collection really pays off.
Read more
Climate strategy & accounting
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "Klimaschutzbeiträge glaubwürdig und EmpCo-konform kommunizieren"
#Knowledge

CO₂ footprint completed: How companies can derive targets and actions

The CO₂ footprint is complete – but what comes next? The key is not only to document emissions data, but to use it to set clear priorities, define suitable climate targets and derive concrete measures. In this article, we show which steps can help companies turn transparency into a sound basis for decision-making.
Read more
Communication & brand
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "EmpCo-Altbestände: Gibt es eine offizielle Abverkaufsfrist?"
#Knowledge

Communicating Climate Contributions Credibly and in Line with EmpCo

The EmpCo Directive significantly changes the requirements for climate-related claims. This article explains how climate contributions can be communicated transparently, the role of Contribution Claims, and what companies should consider to ensure credible climate communication going forward
Read more
Bild der Fokus Zukunft Direktorinnen Janina Lang und Lena Scharr.
#Interview

10 Years of “Fokus Zukunft”: 5 Questions for Janina Lang & Lena Scharr

To mark the 10th anniversary of Fokus Zukunft, our directors, Janina Lang and Lena Scharr, discuss how sustainability has evolved, the milestones that have shaped the company, and what will be important in the future.
Read more
Communication & brand
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "CCF softwaregestützt erstellen: Unsere Partnerschaft mit Carbon+Alt+Delete"
#Knowledge

EmpCo Old Stock: Is There an Official Sell-Through Period?

What happens from 27 September 2026 to goods, packaging and labels that have already been produced and contain sustainability claims? The CPC Common Understanding provides guidance on how authorities should deal with genuine transitional situations and which measures companies should consider now.
Read more
Innovation & transformation
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "CCF softwaregestützt erstellen: Unsere Partnerschaft mit Carbon+Alt+Delete"
#Knowledge

Digital Product Passport: Creating the Right Conditions for Implementation Now

The Digital Product Passport is becoming a concrete reality – and for companies, preparation starts long before the passport itself. What matters is whether product data, responsibilities and processes are already set up effectively. Find out what is becoming important now and how companies can get started.
Read more
Communication & brand
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "Muss der Nachhaltigkeitsbericht Green Claims/EmpCo konform sein?"
#Knowledge

What EmpCo and the Swiss Unfair Competition Act (UWG) Mean for Companies

Many companies are no longer directly subject to CSRD reporting requirements due to the Omnibus package. But does that really mean sustainability reporting is losing relevance? This article shows why voluntary reporting creates orientation right now — for customer requests, banks, tenders and better internal decision-making.
Read more