Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "Der neue VS-Standard"
#Knowledge
Sustainability reporting

The New VS Standard

Voluntary reporting is becoming easier

Info about the article

Author
Danielle Feldstein
Article from
03.06.2026
Updated on
16.09.2026
Approximate reading time
minutes
Share article

Why the VS standard is becoming relevant right now

The new standard was prompted by the realignment of European sustainability regulations as part of the Omnibus Package, which formally took effect in March 2026. The scope of the CSRD has been significantly narrowed. As a result, many companies that had already been considering a potential reporting obligation are now formally outside the direct scope of application.

But that doesn’t settle the matter. Large companies that remain subject to reporting requirements will still need to take information along their value chain into account in the future. As a result, suppliers, service providers, and business partners are often asked to provide sustainability data, even though they themselves are not subject to CSRD requirements. The VS Standard closes precisely this gap. It establishes a common framework for what and how much sustainability information companies should provide outside the scope of the CSRD.

What exactly is the VS standard?

The VS Standard is a voluntary reporting standard for companies not covered by the CSRD. It is particularly relevant for companies with up to 1,000 employees that are required to regularly provide sustainability information to stakeholders.

The goal is clear: Companies should be able to report transparently without being overwhelmed by disproportionate requirements.

What will remain of the VSME, and what will change with the VS standard?

The VSME hasn’t suddenly become worthless. Rather, it forms the foundation upon which the new VS standard is built.

The basic structure also remains familiar. It continues to include a base module with basic sustainability information and an optional expansion module for more in-depth information.

However, once the final VS standard is adopted, companies should review what adjustments are necessary compared to the previous VSME.

What has changed compared to the VSME:

  • While the VSME was originally developed as a voluntary recommendation for unlisted SMEs, the VS Standard is to be legally enshrined as a delegated act. This will make it significantly more relevant in its role as a reference framework.
  • The target audience is being expanded. While the VSME was originally designed for unlisted SMEs, the VS Standard is intended to provide a voluntary framework for companies outside the scope of the CSRD in the future.
  • The standard is intended to be streamlined and simplified. The number of mandatory data points will be reduced, requirements will be structured more clearly, and a clearer distinction will be made between those that are mandatory only when relevant and those that are optional.

There have also been changes to the content. These include, among other things:

  • the elimination of certain metrics, such as greenhouse gas intensity
  • reduced detail requirements in certain subject areas
  • greater differentiation based on company size
  • Optional extensions for Scope 3 emissions and climate targets

These changes clearly show that the new standard is intended to be more practical. The goal is to establish a realistic foundation for reliable sustainability information.

The key innovation: the Value Chain Cap

The most significant change is the integration of the VS standard with the so-called “Value Chain Cap.” Going forward, this mechanism will limit the sustainability information that large companies subject to the CSRD may request from smaller companies in their value chain. The scope of the voluntary standard serves as the limit. This creates, for the first time, a clearly defined framework for data requests within the supply chain.

For small and medium-sized enterprises, this means, above all:

  • less personalized and overly elaborate questionnaires
  • more standardization
  • greater planning certainty
  • greater comparability of requirements

At the same time, this effectively makes the VS standard the de facto minimum standard for much sustainability information. While it remains voluntary, it will become relevant for many companies in practice because customers, banks, and business partners will use it as a guide.

What the VS standard does cover

As helpful as the VS standard is, it has clear limitations.

It is, above all, a simplified reporting framework. Its focus is on providing basic sustainability information in a structured manner. However, it does not replace a comprehensive sustainability strategy. For many companies, the VS standard is sufficient to better respond to customer inquiries and to develop a pragmatic voluntary report.

However, anyone who wants to actively use sustainability for positioning, risk management, transformation, or financing should think beyond the VS Standard. In that case, we recommend aligning more closely with the ESRS and voluntarily adopting selected ESRS elements, such as:

  • The Dual Materiality Analysis
  • a systematic analysis of opportunities and risks
  • the derivation of goals, measures, and key performance indicators
  • An in-depth analysis of climate issues
  • Linking sustainability to the business model and strategy

What does this mean for companies?

Even though the VS standard remains voluntary, it is significantly changing the reality of sustainability reporting. Many SMEs are already finding that, although they are not directly required to report, they still have to provide sustainability information—for example, because a major customer requests ESG data.

The VS standard can serve as a central reference here:

  • in response to customer requests
  • as a structured framework for a voluntary sustainability report
  • as a guide for internal data collection
  • as a means of reducing the number of individual ESG questionnaires
  • in preparation for future requirements

The VS Standard offers a practical starting point, especially for companies that have been unsure about how to report on sustainability in a pragmatic way.

Now is a good time for companies to prepare. The following steps are particularly helpful:

  • an initial assessment of how this affects oneself
  • a review of existing customer and bank requirements
  • an assessment of existing sustainability data
  • a comparison with the current VSME or the draft of the new VS standard
  • the decision as to whether a basic report is sufficient or whether strategic elements should be added

Conclusion

The new VS standard exemplifies the new approach to sustainability regulation in Europe. Fewer companies are directly subject to these requirements. At the same time, more companies are indirectly affected because sustainability information continues to be required throughout supply chains, financing arrangements, and business relationships.

Voluntariness, therefore, does not mean arbitrariness.

The VS Standard is expected to become the central framework for sustainability information outside the CSRD. For many companies, it offers a pragmatic starting point for better managing requirements, reducing data requests, and fostering transparency.

Those who wish to leverage sustainability strategically beyond this point should view the VS Standard not as an endpoint, but as a foundation. When supplemented with selected ESRS elements, it can become an effective management tool—for better decisions, stronger positioning, and greater future viability.

More Articles

Climate strategy & accounting
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "Dekarbonisierung wirtschaftlich bewerten: So entsteht ein belastbarer Business Case"
#Knowledge

Making Your Climate Strategy Visible: Creating Transparency and Building Trust

A well-founded climate strategy provides the foundation – but effective communication is what makes targets, measures and progress visible. How can companies engage employees, build trust with stakeholders and meet the requirements of the EmpCo Directive at the same time?
Read more
Climate strategy & accounting
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "Monetär oder aktivitätsbasiert? Warum die Methode über die Aussagekraft Ihrer CO₂-Bilanz entscheidet"
#Knowledge

Decarbonization: Building a Robust Business Case

Which decarbonization measures make economic sense and which should be prioritized? This article shows how companies can compare investments on a sound basis, factor in CO₂ costs and regulatory developments, and build a robust business case.
Read more
Climate strategy & accounting
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "Nicht jede co₂e-Frage braucht dieselbe Datentiefe"
#Knowledge

Monetary or activity-based carbon footprint?

Monetary data provides a quick entry point into carbon accounting. But for major emission sources, it quickly reaches its limits. Our article explains when activity data becomes essential – and why the calculation method determines what you can later derive from your carbon footprint.
Read more
Climate strategy & accounting
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "CO₂-Bilanz erstellt: So leiten Unternehmen Ziele und Maßnahmen ab"
#Knowledge

Not Every CO₂e Question Requires the Same Level of Data Detail

While estimates or average values are often sufficient for initial insights, more detailed data is needed for specific decisions and emission reduction measures. Our article uses typical questions to show which level of data detail makes sense in which situations – and where the additional effort required for data collection really pays off.
Read more
Climate strategy & accounting
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "Klimaschutzbeiträge glaubwürdig und EmpCo-konform kommunizieren"
#Knowledge

CO₂ footprint completed: How companies can derive targets and actions

The CO₂ footprint is complete – but what comes next? The key is not only to document emissions data, but to use it to set clear priorities, define suitable climate targets and derive concrete measures. In this article, we show which steps can help companies turn transparency into a sound basis for decision-making.
Read more
Communication & brand
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "EmpCo-Altbestände: Gibt es eine offizielle Abverkaufsfrist?"
#Knowledge

Communicating Climate Contributions Credibly and in Line with EmpCo

The EmpCo Directive significantly changes the requirements for climate-related claims. This article explains how climate contributions can be communicated transparently, the role of Contribution Claims, and what companies should consider to ensure credible climate communication going forward
Read more
Bild der Fokus Zukunft Direktorinnen Janina Lang und Lena Scharr.
#Interview

10 Years of “Fokus Zukunft”: 5 Questions for Janina Lang & Lena Scharr

To mark the 10th anniversary of Fokus Zukunft, our directors, Janina Lang and Lena Scharr, discuss how sustainability has evolved, the milestones that have shaped the company, and what will be important in the future.
Read more
Communication & brand
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "CCF softwaregestützt erstellen: Unsere Partnerschaft mit Carbon+Alt+Delete"
#Knowledge

EmpCo Old Stock: Is There an Official Sell-Through Period?

What happens from 27 September 2026 to goods, packaging and labels that have already been produced and contain sustainability claims? The CPC Common Understanding provides guidance on how authorities should deal with genuine transitional situations and which measures companies should consider now.
Read more
Innovation & transformation
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "CCF softwaregestützt erstellen: Unsere Partnerschaft mit Carbon+Alt+Delete"
#Knowledge

Digital Product Passport: Creating the Right Conditions for Implementation Now

The Digital Product Passport is becoming a concrete reality – and for companies, preparation starts long before the passport itself. What matters is whether product data, responsibilities and processes are already set up effectively. Find out what is becoming important now and how companies can get started.
Read more
Communication & brand
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "Muss der Nachhaltigkeitsbericht Green Claims/EmpCo konform sein?"
#Knowledge

What EmpCo and the Swiss Unfair Competition Act (UWG) Mean for Companies

Many companies are no longer directly subject to CSRD reporting requirements due to the Omnibus package. But does that really mean sustainability reporting is losing relevance? This article shows why voluntary reporting creates orientation right now — for customer requests, banks, tenders and better internal decision-making.
Read more