Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "Der neue VS-Standard"
#Knowledge
Sustainability reporting

The New VS Standard

Voluntary reporting is becoming easier

Info about the article

Author
Danielle Feldstein
Article from
03.06.2026
Updated on
26.08.2026
Approximate reading time
minutes
Share article

Why the VS standard is becoming relevant right now

The new standard was prompted by the realignment of European sustainability regulations as part of the Omnibus Package, which formally took effect in March 2026. The scope of the CSRD has been significantly narrowed. As a result, many companies that had already been considering a potential reporting obligation are now formally outside the direct scope of application.

But that doesn’t settle the matter. Large companies that remain subject to reporting requirements will still need to take information along their value chain into account in the future. As a result, suppliers, service providers, and business partners are often asked to provide sustainability data, even though they themselves are not subject to CSRD requirements. The VS Standard closes precisely this gap. It establishes a common framework for what and how much sustainability information companies should provide outside the scope of the CSRD.

What exactly is the VS standard?

The VS Standard is a voluntary reporting standard for companies not covered by the CSRD. It is particularly relevant for companies with up to 1,000 employees that are required to regularly provide sustainability information to stakeholders.

The goal is clear: Companies should be able to report transparently without being overwhelmed by disproportionate requirements.

What will remain of the VSME, and what will change with the VS standard?

The VSME hasn’t suddenly become worthless. Rather, it forms the foundation upon which the new VS standard is built.

The basic structure also remains familiar. It continues to include a base module with basic sustainability information and an optional expansion module for more in-depth information.

However, once the final VS standard is adopted, companies should review what adjustments are necessary compared to the previous VSME.

What has changed compared to the VSME:

  • While the VSME was originally developed as a voluntary recommendation for unlisted SMEs, the VS Standard is to be legally enshrined as a delegated act. This will make it significantly more relevant in its role as a reference framework.
  • The target audience is being expanded. While the VSME was originally designed for unlisted SMEs, the VS Standard is intended to provide a voluntary framework for companies outside the scope of the CSRD in the future.
  • The standard is intended to be streamlined and simplified. The number of mandatory data points will be reduced, requirements will be structured more clearly, and a clearer distinction will be made between those that are mandatory only when relevant and those that are optional.

There have also been changes to the content. These include, among other things:

  • the elimination of certain metrics, such as greenhouse gas intensity
  • reduced detail requirements in certain subject areas
  • greater differentiation based on company size
  • Optional extensions for Scope 3 emissions and climate targets

These changes clearly show that the new standard is intended to be more practical. The goal is to establish a realistic foundation for reliable sustainability information.

The key innovation: the Value Chain Cap

The most significant change is the integration of the VS standard with the so-called “Value Chain Cap.” Going forward, this mechanism will limit the sustainability information that large companies subject to the CSRD may request from smaller companies in their value chain. The scope of the voluntary standard serves as the limit. This creates, for the first time, a clearly defined framework for data requests within the supply chain.

For small and medium-sized enterprises, this means, above all:

  • less personalized and overly elaborate questionnaires
  • more standardization
  • greater planning certainty
  • greater comparability of requirements

At the same time, this effectively makes the VS standard the de facto minimum standard for much sustainability information. While it remains voluntary, it will become relevant for many companies in practice because customers, banks, and business partners will use it as a guide.

What the VS standard does cover

As helpful as the VS standard is, it has clear limitations.

It is, above all, a simplified reporting framework. Its focus is on providing basic sustainability information in a structured manner. However, it does not replace a comprehensive sustainability strategy. For many companies, the VS standard is sufficient to better respond to customer inquiries and to develop a pragmatic voluntary report.

However, anyone who wants to actively use sustainability for positioning, risk management, transformation, or financing should think beyond the VS Standard. In that case, we recommend aligning more closely with the ESRS and voluntarily adopting selected ESRS elements, such as:

  • The Dual Materiality Analysis
  • a systematic analysis of opportunities and risks
  • the derivation of goals, measures, and key performance indicators
  • An in-depth analysis of climate issues
  • Linking sustainability to the business model and strategy

What does this mean for companies?

Even though the VS standard remains voluntary, it is significantly changing the reality of sustainability reporting. Many SMEs are already finding that, although they are not directly required to report, they still have to provide sustainability information—for example, because a major customer requests ESG data.

The VS standard can serve as a central reference here:

  • in response to customer requests
  • as a structured framework for a voluntary sustainability report
  • as a guide for internal data collection
  • as a means of reducing the number of individual ESG questionnaires
  • in preparation for future requirements

The VS Standard offers a practical starting point, especially for companies that have been unsure about how to report on sustainability in a pragmatic way.

Now is a good time for companies to prepare. The following steps are particularly helpful:

  • an initial assessment of how this affects oneself
  • a review of existing customer and bank requirements
  • an assessment of existing sustainability data
  • a comparison with the current VSME or the draft of the new VS standard
  • the decision as to whether a basic report is sufficient or whether strategic elements should be added
Diese Timeline zeigt, wie es zum VS-Standard kam und welche Schritte noch bevorstehen.

Conclusion

The new VS standard exemplifies the new approach to sustainability regulation in Europe. Fewer companies are directly subject to these requirements. At the same time, more companies are indirectly affected because sustainability information continues to be required throughout supply chains, financing arrangements, and business relationships.

Voluntariness, therefore, does not mean arbitrariness.

The VS Standard is expected to become the central framework for sustainability information outside the CSRD. For many companies, it offers a pragmatic starting point for better managing requirements, reducing data requests, and fostering transparency.

Those who wish to leverage sustainability strategically beyond this point should view the VS Standard not as an endpoint, but as a foundation. When supplemented with selected ESRS elements, it can become an effective management tool—for better decisions, stronger positioning, and greater future viability.

More Articles

Innovation & transformation
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "CCF softwaregestützt erstellen: Unsere Partnerschaft mit Carbon+Alt+Delete"
#Knowledge

Digital Product Passport: Creating the Right Conditions for Implementation Now

The Digital Product Passport is becoming a concrete reality – and for companies, preparation starts long before the passport itself. What matters is whether product data, responsibilities and processes are already set up effectively. Find out what is becoming important now and how companies can get started.
Read more
Climate strategy & accounting
#Knowledge

Create your CCF with software support: Our partnership with Carbon+Alt+Delete

Fokus Zukunft is now a partner of Carbon+Alt+Delete. In our blog, we explain what the partnership is about, why we are expanding our services to include software-supported carbon accounting, and what benefits this creates for you.
Read more
Climate strategy & accounting
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel zu ETS II
#Knowledge

ETS II: postponement to 2028?

The launch of the European Emissions Trading System ETS II is likely to be postponed until 2028. However, CO₂ pricing remains a key lever of climate policy. What does this mean for companies in Germany and what steps should be taken now? Our blog post summarizes the current situation and shows how you can remain strategically prepared.
Read more
Communication & brand
#Knowledge

Why companies should take voluntary reporting seriously

Many companies are no longer directly subject to CSRD reporting requirements due to the Omnibus package. But does that really mean sustainability reporting is losing relevance? This article shows why voluntary reporting creates orientation right now — for customer requests, banks, tenders and better internal decision-making.
Read more
Sustainability reporting
Communication & brand
#Knowledge

Why companies should take voluntary reporting seriously

Many companies are no longer directly subject to CSRD reporting requirements due to the Omnibus package. But does that really mean sustainability reporting is losing relevance? This article shows why voluntary reporting creates orientation right now — for customer requests, banks, tenders and better internal decision-making.
Read more
Sustainability reporting
#Knowledge

Why companies should take voluntary reporting seriously

Many companies are no longer directly subject to CSRD reporting requirements due to the Omnibus package. But does that really mean sustainability reporting is losing relevance? This article shows why voluntary reporting creates orientation right now — for customer requests, banks, tenders and better internal decision-making.
Read more
Sustainability reporting
#Knowledge

According to the report—these next steps are worth taking now

The sustainability report is complete—but what happens to the data that was collected? By analyzing it in a targeted manner, companies can identify concrete next steps: from climate strategy and product carbon footprints to EmpCo-compliant reporting, EcoVadis, and upcoming product requirements.
Read more
Communication & brand
#Knowledge

The circular economy: sustainability and innovation in harmony

The circular economy combines growth and environmental protection, closes material cycles and uses resources efficiently. Find out how companies can reduce costs and open up new markets as a result.
Read more
Sustainability strategy
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "Chancen- und Risikoanalyse – Risiken erkennen, Chancen nutzen, Kosten vermeiden"
#Knowledge

Opportunity & risk analysis – recognizing risks, taking advantage of opportunities

The opportunity and risk analysis helps to systematically identify and assessnopportunities and recognize potential risks at an early stage. Keep reading to find out what an opportunity and risk analysis is, why climate risk analysis is an important part of it and what advantages it offers.
Read more
Sustainability reporting
#Knowledge

The Sustainability Report Is Complete—Now What? How Putting It to Use Makes a Real Difference

Published, filed away, forgotten? A sustainability report can achieve so much more. By using its content strategically, a company can strengthen its communication and sales efforts, respond more quickly to requirements, and make sustainability within the company measurable and open to further development.
Read more