Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek Artikel "CCF vs. PCF"
#Knowledge
Climate strategy & accounting

CCF vs. PCF

Differences, challenges and opportunities

Info about the article

Author
Julia Jahn
Article from
13.01.2025
Updated on
19.11.2025
Approximate reading time
minutes
Share article

“With CCF and PCF, companies can identify the biggest emission drivers and reduce them effectively.”

Introduction

Terms such as Corporate Carbon Footprint (CCF) and Product Carbon Footprint (PCF) play a central role in corporate sustainability. But what do they mean in concrete terms and how can companies benefit from the calculations?

We passed these and other questions on to Jessica Sieber. As one of our sustainability experts, she provides an understandable introduction and shows why these concepts are so relevant right now.

What is CCF?

The corporate carbon footprint (CCF) provides information about a company’s total greenhouse gas emissions over a certain period of time, usually one year. These emissions are generated both directly within the company, for example through production processes and the company fleet, and indirectly along the value chain, such as through the use of products from other companies and their disposal.

When calculating the CCF, emissions are divided into three categories, known as scopes:

  • Scope 1 includes all direct emissions that originate from sources within the company, such as emissions from company vehicles and heating systems.
  • Scope 2 includes indirect emissions from the purchase of energy, such as electricity and district heating, which are generated outside the company.
  • Scope 3 covers all other indirect emissions that occur along the entire value chain, such as emissions from purchased preliminary products,

Business trips and the use and disposal of products by customers.
The calculation is based on the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard, whereby the emissions are converted into CO₂ equivalents (CO₂e) in order to create a uniform measure for the various greenhouse gases.

What is a PCF?

In contrast, the Product Carbon Footprint (PCF) focuses on the greenhouse gas emissions of individual products or product lines. It looks at the life cycle phases that a product goes through: raw material procurement, production, transportation, use and disposal. Recognized standards for calculating the PCF are the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Product Life Cycle Accounting and Reporting Standard and ISO14067.

When calculating the PCF, various system boundaries are defined in order to record the emissions. The most common approaches are cradle-to-gate and cradle-to-grave:

  • Cradle-to-gate takes into account emissions from raw material extraction to the factory gate.
  • Cradle-to-grave covers the entire life cycle of a product, from the extraction of raw materials to production, transportation, use and disposal.

As part of the system boundaries, the so-called “functional unit” must also be defined in advance. The functional unit describes the benefit of the product under investigation and the basis to which the results of the PCF are related. Examples of a functional unit could be: a 500 ml bottle of mineral water, wearing a T-shirt 80 times or a small car with a mileage of 200,000 km.

Two PCFs can only be compared with each other if they have the same system limits.

Challenges in the calculation of CCF and PCF

One of the key challenges many companies face when calculating their carbon footprints is the often limited availability of reliable data. In such cases, it is advisable to begin by focusing on easily accessible data, such as energy bills and vehicle mileage records. Harder-to-obtain values can initially be estimated using proxies—such as monetary values, internal estimates, or industry benchmarks.For companies that are just beginning their sustainability journey, we recommend gradually adapting internal structures for data collection and management. This helps reduce the effort required for future carbon assessments over time. Of course, we are here to provide guidance and support throughout this process.

How companies benefit from CCF and PCF calculations

The CCF calculation provides companies with a comprehensive overview of the emissions of their entire value chain. They can see which items have particularly high emissions, known as hotspots, and respond to them with targeted reduction measures. This is particularly important for the development of a comprehensive sustainability strategy. However, stakeholders are also increasingly demanding transparent disclosure of the emissions generated.

The PCF enables the emissions of individual products to be determined and product comparisons to be made, provided the same system boundaries have been selected. As with the CCF, hotspots can also be taken from the balance sheet. This information can be used in development to make products more efficient and lower in emissions. This can have a positive influence on the purchasing decisions of environmentally conscious customers. Another advantage of the PCF for companies is that the results can be used for parts of the CCF after the calculation. This saves time and money on the next accounting exercise.

To summarize

Both the Corporate Carbon Footprint (CCF) and the Product Carbon Footprint (PCF) are key instruments for measuring the greenhouse gas emissions of a company or its products.

While the CCF provides a holistic view of a company’s CO2e emissions, the PCF offers detailed insights into the greenhouse gas emissions of individual products or product lines. As the preparation of these acccounting exercises can be challenging and time-consuming for companies, targeted advice can be helpful.

Fokus Zukunft offers comprehensive assistance with data collection in order to minimize the time required by the company. We use proven methods, standards, tools and databases to create precise accounting sheets. We also offer targeted advice on reduction strategies.

Further contributions

Climate strategy & accounting
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "Monetär oder aktivitätsbasiert? Warum die Methode über die Aussagekraft Ihrer CO₂-Bilanz entscheidet"
#Knowledge

Decarbonization: Building a Robust Business Case

Which decarbonization measures make economic sense and which should be prioritized? This article shows how companies can compare investments on a sound basis, factor in CO₂ costs and regulatory developments, and build a robust business case.
Read more
Climate strategy & accounting
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "Nicht jede co₂e-Frage braucht dieselbe Datentiefe"
#Knowledge

Monetary or activity-based carbon footprint?

Monetary data provides a quick entry point into carbon accounting. But for major emission sources, it quickly reaches its limits. Our article explains when activity data becomes essential – and why the calculation method determines what you can later derive from your carbon footprint.
Read more
Climate strategy & accounting
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "CO₂-Bilanz erstellt: So leiten Unternehmen Ziele und Maßnahmen ab"
#Knowledge

Not Every CO₂e Question Requires the Same Level of Data Detail

While estimates or average values are often sufficient for initial insights, more detailed data is needed for specific decisions and emission reduction measures. Our article uses typical questions to show which level of data detail makes sense in which situations – and where the additional effort required for data collection really pays off.
Read more
Climate strategy & accounting
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "Klimaschutzbeiträge glaubwürdig und EmpCo-konform kommunizieren"
#Knowledge

CO₂ footprint completed: How companies can derive targets and actions

The CO₂ footprint is complete – but what comes next? The key is not only to document emissions data, but to use it to set clear priorities, define suitable climate targets and derive concrete measures. In this article, we show which steps can help companies turn transparency into a sound basis for decision-making.
Read more
Communication & brand
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "EmpCo-Altbestände: Gibt es eine offizielle Abverkaufsfrist?"
#Knowledge

Communicating Climate Contributions Credibly and in Line with EmpCo

The EmpCo Directive significantly changes the requirements for climate-related claims. This article explains how climate contributions can be communicated transparently, the role of Contribution Claims, and what companies should consider to ensure credible climate communication going forward
Read more
Bild der Fokus Zukunft Direktorinnen Janina Lang und Lena Scharr.
#Interview

10 Years of “Fokus Zukunft”: 5 Questions for Janina Lang & Lena Scharr

To mark the 10th anniversary of Fokus Zukunft, our directors, Janina Lang and Lena Scharr, discuss how sustainability has evolved, the milestones that have shaped the company, and what will be important in the future.
Read more
Communication & brand
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "CCF softwaregestützt erstellen: Unsere Partnerschaft mit Carbon+Alt+Delete"
#Knowledge

EmpCo Old Stock: Is There an Official Sell-Through Period?

What happens from 27 September 2026 to goods, packaging and labels that have already been produced and contain sustainability claims? The CPC Common Understanding provides guidance on how authorities should deal with genuine transitional situations and which measures companies should consider now.
Read more
Innovation & transformation
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "CCF softwaregestützt erstellen: Unsere Partnerschaft mit Carbon+Alt+Delete"
#Knowledge

Digital Product Passport: Creating the Right Conditions for Implementation Now

The Digital Product Passport is becoming a concrete reality – and for companies, preparation starts long before the passport itself. What matters is whether product data, responsibilities and processes are already set up effectively. Find out what is becoming important now and how companies can get started.
Read more
Communication & brand
Headerbild für den Wissensbibliothek-Artikel "Muss der Nachhaltigkeitsbericht Green Claims/EmpCo konform sein?"
#Knowledge

What EmpCo and the Swiss Unfair Competition Act (UWG) Mean for Companies

Many companies are no longer directly subject to CSRD reporting requirements due to the Omnibus package. But does that really mean sustainability reporting is losing relevance? This article shows why voluntary reporting creates orientation right now — for customer requests, banks, tenders and better internal decision-making.
Read more
Climate strategy & accounting
#Knowledge

Create your CCF with software support: Our partnership with Carbon+Alt+Delete

Fokus Zukunft is now a partner of Carbon+Alt+Delete. In our blog, we explain what the partnership is about, why we are expanding our services to include software-supported carbon accounting, and what benefits this creates for you.
Read more